End-of-Year Check-In: Are Your Investments Aligned with Your Estate Plan?

As the year winds down, it’s the perfect time to reflect on your financial goals and ensure your investments and estate plan are working together seamlessly. If you’ve experienced significant financial or personal changes this year — or even if you haven’t — an end-of-year check-in can help you maximize tax benefits, avoid costly mistakes, and keep your legacy on track.

Here are a few key areas to review before the clock strikes midnight on December 31.

1. Review Your Beneficiary Designations

Beneficiary designations on accounts like 401(k)s, IRAs, and life insurance policies override what’s written in your will or trust. This means outdated designations can cause unintended consequences.

Example: Imagine you remarried but forgot to update the beneficiary on your IRA. If your ex-spouse is still listed, they’ll inherit the account — even if your estate plan says otherwise. Double-check that all beneficiary designations reflect your current wishes.

2. Maximize Tax-Advantaged Gifting

The end of the year is your last chance to take advantage of the annual gift tax exclusion for 2024, which allows you to gift up to $18,000 per recipient without incurring gift taxes.

Example: If you want to reduce the size of your taxable estate, you could gift $18,000 to each of your three children and their spouses. If you’re married, you and your spouse can combine your exclusions to gift $36,000 per person, transferring up to $216,000 out of your estate in one year.

3. Consider Charitable Giving

Donating appreciated assets or setting up a Donor-Advised Fund (DAF) can reduce your taxable income while supporting causes you care about.

Example: If you donate stock valued at $50,000 (originally purchased for $20,000) to a DAF, you avoid paying capital gains tax on the $30,000 appreciation and get a charitable deduction for the full $50,000, all while leaving a charitable legacy.

4. Align Your Investments with Your Estate Plan

Your estate plan and investment strategy should work hand-in-hand to protect and transfer your wealth efficiently. Consider whether your assets are properly titled and whether trusts could help reduce taxes or simplify transfers.

Example: If you’ve invested in rental properties, placing them in a revocable living trust can keep them out of probate, ensuring your heirs receive them quickly and efficiently.

Finish the Year Strong

A little year-end planning can go a long way toward securing your financial future and protecting your legacy. Whether you need to update beneficiary designations, make tax-savvy gifts, or ensure your investments align with your estate plan, taking action now can save you time, stress, and money later.

Contact us today to schedule your end-of-year estate planning review. Let’s make sure 2025 starts off right!

Your Home = Your Wealth

For most of us, our primary source of wealth is our family home, our primary residence. Especially for Bay Area folks. We have watched our property values soar, and accordingly enjoy built up equity in our homes. The problem—if you want to call it that—is that the equity is not sitting in our bank accounts. It’s “stuck” in our homes. And we cannot access it without selling the ground on which we stand.

This means that for many of us, our largest asset is the thing we sleep in. It’s what is going to make up the bulk of our estate. So when it comes time to create an estate plan, several issues need to be addressed to have a comprehensive estate plan that will be effective when the time comes.

Is your home sentimental?

Let’s face it, unless you leave your home to someone who loves it as much as you do, they’re likely going to sell it and enjoy the cash. If your home is sentimental, or if your family legacy is tied to it, your estate plan should clearly define what your beneficiaries can–and cannot–do with the home. Can they live in it? Can they rent it out? Can they sell it? If they cannot sell it, where does the house end up when your beneficiaries die?

Do you have more than one beneficiary?

Many families leave a bulk of their estate to their children. And many families have more than one child. If you have one home, and multiple children, you don’t want to “leave it up to the kids” when it comes to the family home. What if one child wants to live in it but the other wants to cash out? Is it important to plan ahead for any increases in property taxes? Do you want to allow for either child to have the option to purchase the other’s share?

Are there competing interests for the home?

Many of us are the “‘tween” generation these days. They have little ones at home while caring for one or more aging parents. You may find yourself in a position where you want to provide a place for your parents to live, but also leave an inheritance to your adult children. If you want to keep the house for your parents to live in, have you made adequate plans for the trust to pay the expenses for the home while your parents live there? What if your children need the equity in the home to pay for college while your parents need a place to live? Which dependents get priority?

Many of us do not have adequate cash and other investments to offset distributing our entire home to one child and hope that our other children miraculously receive some equalizing gift. There are lending and other financing strategies to offset such a gift, but they need to be carefully planned for ahead of time. It’s imperative to consider your own thoughts with respect to your home, and then plan accordingly.

Avoid the Estate Planning Banana Peel – Don’t Add Your Kids on Title to your Home

Many aspects of estate planning in California center around avoiding the need for probate court. Adding a death beneficiary to an asset or adding a co-owner on title to an asset are two ways to avoid the need for probate court when you die. Well, that sounds pretty easy. Why don’t we all just do that and call it a day?

Put simply, adding co-owners and death beneficiaries to assets only addresses one situation: that 1) you have died; 2) that the beneficiary/co-owner is alive upon your death; 3) the beneficiary/co-owner has capacity and is over 18 years old upon your death; and 4) the beneficiary/co-owner does not have creditors nipping at their heels.

There are so many other scenarios that can occur. All it takes is for any one of the four factors above to be false for your simple plan to become complicated and problematic. Besides that, there are tax implications for adding people onto title of your assets.

Let’s illustrate with a common example. A widowed parent owns their own home, and has two children. The parent figures that it would simplify everything if they add their two children onto the title of the home. That way, upon the parent’s death, the children receive the home, in equal shares, without having to go through the probate process.

What gets overlooked in the above hypothetical are the following considerations.

Death v. Incapacity

The only way to avoid probate in the above example is if the parent dies. If the parent is alive but incapacitated (think: dimentia), the children have no authority to act on the parent’s behalf by simply being co-owner of the home. They now co-own a property with someone who cannot handle their own affairs. They would have needed the parent to sign other legal documents, such as a durable power of attorney.

Similarly, if either or both children are incapacitated upon the parent’s death, probate may be necessary to receive ownership of the home unless the incapacitated child signed a durable power of attorney themself. Or, if the children are not yet adults, they cannot own the property outright without legal guardians involved.

Creditors

When the parent adds the children as co-owners to any asset, including their home, the parent is entangled with that child’s financial life, including that child’s creditors. If the child is going through a divorce, or someone is suing them for money, or the child owes taxes or other debts, or if the child files for bankruptcy, then the parent’s home is now subject to the claims of the child’s creditors. The parent may have to figure out how to get their own house back!

Additionally, if the child faces those same creditors after the parent’s death, there is no barrier between receiving full ownership of the house and satisfying those creditors’ claims. Ultimately, the child may end up losing the home to their creditors, which is certainly not what the parent intended.

Creating Capital Gains and Property Tax Problems (Click here for a brief discussion of taxes)

When the parent adds their children to title, the parent is making a lifetime gift of that portion of the home. This in itself could trigger a gift tax issue. Gift tax issues aside, typically when the parent dies, all of the capital gains built into the home are eliminated upon the parent’s death. But only the capital gains associated with the portion of the home that the parent owned at death. The portion of the home that the children now own do not receive what is called a “step up in basis”, and the capital gains for the children’s portion are not eliminated. If the parent kept all 100% interest in the home, then all of the capital gains would have been eliminated. After putting their children on title during their life, the parent is now creating a capital gains problem for the children when they sell the home.

Adding multiple children to title can also create adverse property tax implications. Even though Prop 19 has severely limited the application of the parent-child exclusion, there is still an opportunity for the parent to transfer the home to one or more children with some relief from increased property taxes. However, when more than one child is added as co-owner, the home could get reassessed when one child decides to buy another out in the future since that is not a parent-child transaction.

Co-ownership and death beneficiary designations lack any nuance. It only asks whether an owner is dead, and if the answer is yes, ownership of the asset automatically transfers to the other co-owners or to the beneficiaries in whatever condition or circumstance they find themselves. No discretion is involved to determine whether it’s a “good” situation to transfer ownership of the home to the co-owner or beneficiary. Additionally, It makes you vulnerable to your co-owners’ creditors, and could create unforeseen tax issues for your loved ones. The only surefire way to transfer ownership of your assets, with nuance and full discretion, is to create a comprehensive estate plan.

What is... a Trustee?

This is part of an on-going series of blog posts titled the "What Is..." series, where we attempt to explain, in simple terms, common estate planning terms and concepts. To read other posts in this series, click here.

A trustee is a person (or sometimes an institution, like a bank) who has the power to act on behalf of a trust. If you establish a living trust (as a trustor), then most of the time you will be the initial trustee. You act on behalf of the trust. 

As the trustor (also known as the person who established the trust), you also name successor trustees -- people who will act on behalf of the trust after you, either because you no longer want to, or you are not able to do so, or because you have passed away. 

As the trustee of your own living trust, nothing changes on a day-to-day basis. You even file taxes the same way. The living trust is more like a legal alias for you.

But what do your successor trustees do for your trust? Or, what do YOU do if you’re named as a successor trustee for someone else? 

In sum: the trustee’s job is to carry out the directions set forth in the trust document. 

There are some initial steps that a successor trustee must take after the death of the trustor. Please note that this is not an exhaustive list -- and this is exactly what we help with as attorneys. This is for informational purposes, to give you some idea of the responsibilities involved. 

First, the trustee must accept the position so that they can act on behalf of the trust. Then:

1. In general, the trustee must notify the beneficiaries and heirs that they are beneficiaries of the trust.

2. Certain government offices must be notified as well, depending on the trustor’s assets and benefits. For example, if the trustor owned real estate, then the assessor’s office must be notified. If the trustor was receiving social security benefits or Medi-Cal benefits, those agencies would need to be notified.

3. The trustee must then inventory and determine the value of assets as of the date of the trustor’s death (e.g. appraisals of property, etc.). This is required to determine the value of the assets for tax purposes, and to provide an accounting of the trust property to the beneficiaries.

4. In addition to handling an estate tax return, the trustee may be required to file the trustor’s final income tax return for the year that they died. The trustee may also have to file an income tax return if the trust estate earns money before it is all distributed to the beneficiaries. 

The trustee must then follow the instructions in the trust, within the boundaries of the law. This may include paying funeral expenses, outstanding credit card debts, etc. Some trusts have certain time periods during which the beneficiaries should receive a distribution, or they may have conditions that must be met before a beneficiary receives a distribution. Some trusts require waiting a certain period of time before the beneficiary receives a distribution, or the trust may contain outright restrictions on distribution. The trustee is tasked with interpreting and executing all of these instructions.

The trustee has a fiduciary duty to the trust. This means that just because they have the right to do something doesn’t mean that they should do it. For example, they may have the ability to sell trust assets like a home, but if they sell it for below the market value, or in a down market, they could have breached their fiduciary duty.

It’s important to know what the trust says to be able to execute its provisions and comply with the legal requirements. 

If you are a successor trustee for a loved one, please contact us for a free initial consultation. If you have a trust, and would like to ensure that it says what you want it to say for your trustee, please also contact us for an initial consultation.

How to Disinherit a Family Member

Sometimes there may be a family member who you want to make sure does not receive anything from your trust or estate. Perhaps they have enough financial support that they do not need more or perhaps there is a personal rift. 

It’s important to know that there are certain people who you cannot disinherit by omitting them from your estate planning documents: a spouse and a minor child. There is a presumption in California that you intend to provide for a spouse and for minor children; therefore, leaving them out of your documents is not sufficient. For spouses, minor children, and (really) everyone else, there are steps you can take to make sure that your wishes to exclude someone are legally binding and not subject to litigation. 

What does it mean to disinherit? 

Disinheriting means affirmatively excluding relatives from becoming heirs or beneficiaries of your trust or estate. For example, if someone has an estranged parent or child, they may want to disinherit that person. 

No one is entitled to receive something from you after you die. However, in certain circumstances, spouses and children are presumed to have been intended beneficiaries. If you die without any estate planning documents OR all your named beneficiaries have predeceased you, then your assets could go to your closest living relatives. (Your closest living relatives are determined by state law and the list starts with your children, then your parents, then your siblings, then your nieces and nephews, then aunts and uncles, then cousins, etc.) 

How do I disinherit? 

If there is a close family member who is potentially entitled to receive something (a parent, child, sibling), then it is important that the person is explicitly named and acknowledged, and that the person was intentionally excluded as a beneficiary. 

What about a token gift? 

If you provide a token gift (e.g. $1) then that person becomes a beneficiary. Beneficiaries are afforded rights of notice and due process, regardless of the size of their gift. By learning that they received merely a token gift, they may feel emboldened to file a law suit. Even if their claim ultimately lacks merit, your trustees may feel compelled to settle the suit, since it is often cheaper to settle than to prove the claim lacks merit. If your intention is to EXCLUDE someone, then you probably don’t want them on that list of beneficiaries. 

What about a bigger gift? 

Sometimes, the best way to “get rid” of potential litigation is to give someone enough that it’s not worth their time to file a lawsuit to try to get more. If you give someone $1, it’s easy to say that they have nothing to lose in filing a suit. If you give someone $1000, it may not be worth it to them. 

What about “no contest” clauses? 

A no contest clause is a part of a will or trust that says that anyone who contests the document, and fails, won’t receive anything. In California, courts are reticent to lock potential viable claims out of court. So no contest clauses only practically come into play for claims with zero merit on its face. The economics of litigation often result in out of court settlements, even when a claim lacks merit. Although no contest clauses are considered best practices, you do not want to rely on such a clause to prevent future will or trust contests.  

So what should you do if you want to leave someone out? 

If you decide to disinherit a family member, call us to discuss options for how best to proceed.

An Ambiguous Disposition: Right of Survivorship on Bank Accounts

Late in 2019, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision (Placencia v Strazicich) which impacts people with beneficiaries on bank accounts. 

In the case, Ralph Placencia had a joint bank account that had an express right of survivorship in favor of one of his daughters. However, before he died, Ralph left a will stating that he wanted the proceeds of the bank account to go to all three of his daughters (not just the one whose name was jointly on his account). 

The conflict between the beneficiary designation and Ralph’s will lead to litigation. After analyzing the law, the court determined that a will, in and of itself, cannot render a beneficiary designation ineffective. However, the court did allow for a very limited circumstance where a decedent’s intent, shown by “clear and convincing” evidence, may invalidate a beneficiary designation. Even if that evidence is contained in statements made in a will. 

In other words: if you have a joint account with another person (e.g. a parent), the right of survivorship on the joint account is not absolute. Even though this court decision is very limited in scope, it does reinforce the principle that the right of survivorship will be determined by the decedent’s intent—which can be supported by statements made in a will, among other forms of evidence. 

Make your intentions clear. Almost every case dealing with an ambiguous gift will come down to the decedent’s intent.